Select Page

Welcome to TeX.sx!

And then there was the fact that it was super-easy to crash and lose all your work in an instant. I found many other answers to this question unfair or misguided for TeXmacs, so I decided to write one of my own. PortableApps.com The input format is reStructuredText. Is it legal for Microsoft to install software without user approval? using InDesign is pretty much the same except the oar is smoother Beyond that, I am skeptical that a fiddly GUI interface will necessarily be faster or more efficient (or more navigable...) than a plaintext interface, especially to someone using a competent text editor like Vim. They are different, the idea in TeXmacs is that WYSIWYG, on screen as on paper. If you are interested in typography, then Heirloom version of troff is definitely the way to do. LaTeX is not only markup but also typesetting. Therefore TeXstudio has... TeX Live is an easy way to get up and running with the TeX document production system. Get it here. The final quality is always pretty good in any case and it is hard to believe it is not LaTeX. I read that it is largely dead. I'm intrigued by the grid-based support and text flowing. Moreover, TeXmacs can be used as an interface for many external systems for computer algebra, numerical analysis, statistics, etc. That's right, all the lists of alternatives are crowd-sourced, and that's what makes the data powerful and relevant.

It claims to use Latex for its typesetting, but my experience with it (although admittedly years ago) was that for serious math applications, you have to export Latex code and edit it by hand if you want to get what you want. I have not used InDesign myself seriously, but from what I've seen done with it, I think it is a great typesetting system (ranking high together with QuarkXpress). Would it have been possible to launch rockets in secret in the 1960s? Amongst many, let me just point the two most obvious quality advantages of TeX: Typesetting maths correctly is very complex (symbols need to adjust in size, spaces are very specific, etc. It can typeset any XML input but also provides an input syntax similar to that of LaTeX: Rinohtype, written in Python.

One thing that Texmacs does rather well is change fonts.

Haiku. I found a particularly nasty case where just changing the type of header (chapter, sub-chapter, etc) crashed TeXmacs and caused all further attempts to open the file to crash the program immediately... grr. Not only does it provide Knuth's algorithm for formatting paragraphs; it also allows to compute spacing by mixing three systems (interletters spacing, interwords spacing, imperceptible change in the shapes of the glyphs). Are there any accurate velocity plots of all spacecraft that achieved escape velocity from the solar system? ". Also, the embedded scripting languages is a huge win. https://groups.google.com/forum/message/raw?msg=comp.text.tex/8zugdUxw6dI/mu7Qzs4bQDYJ. GNU TeXmacs is self-documented. I’ve been using MS Office WYSIWYG Word and MathType to write hundreds of documents ever since Gates was in diapers. One can enchant a set of oars to accomplish a given journey, easing the jake2042 Apr 18, 2020 At 5:02 am. Collapsing of sections is possible with non-standard notation \begin{section}{}...\end{section}{}, but it eliminates sections from Structure View. RTL support means Right to Left language support. Nice edit, I searched for this just to add it :) But it seems that you already added it. Thanks for the link. A Stanford professor named Dr. Donald Knuth invented a lower-level markup language called Tex as far back as 1976, and Latex, designed in 1985 by Leslie Lamport, was and is just a bunch of Tex macros, sophisticated enough in itself to amount to a higher-level language. It only takes a minute to sign up. Add Video or Image. The list of alternatives was updated Jan 2020. So why is it considered better … project each month) --- the oar can be smoothed somewhat and reinforced TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. In some ways, it is better. Converters exist for TeX/LaTeX and Html/Mathml. \end{document}. The current version, numbered 5.5, has been around since at least 2007 (and probably even longer).

Is Latex the only choice, is there any (emerging) alternative? Provides a subset of the regular expression syntax implemented in the, Documentation of the code completion feature, Comparison of desktop publishing software, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Comparison_of_TeX_editors&oldid=978056016, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, This page was last edited on 12 September 2020, at 16:58. Commands look like a mixture of TeX, OCaml and new markup: Note that I have no idea if this code works, I just copied together parts of the manual. LyX is rock-solid stable, on the other hand (and has fewer "gotchas" due to its lack of WYSYWIG). After 10 minutes of using it, I uninstalled the whole thing, and also uninstalled indesign (was trial version). (Pioneers, Voyagers, & New Horizons), Filament residue sticks to bed and wont come off, Convert "10.1.1.1-10.1.1.3" format to "10.1.1.1-3". It provides a unified and user friendly framework for editing structured documents with different types of content: text, math, graphics, slides, etc. (The developers seem to be really keen on functional languages.)

+1 for recommending Troff. It is just like using the equation editor with Word.

AlternativeTo is a free service that helps you find better alternatives to the products you love and hate. (Hey, it's open source, so you can use it). pure Lua) to provide the “back-end”. Starts up to previous state including the current editing point. Moreover, the real-time typesetter in TeXmacs rivals the output of TeX/LaTeX. Open Source As long as you don't need mathematical typesetting, you actually can find better than TeX with Heirloom Documentation Tools. Why do some change direction between planets? Patoline, written in OCaml. I'm really interested in whether Lout and Ant have ever been used. I'm also interested in their "stories", why they are unmaintained, what happened with the author, etc. using ConTeXt, a very nice oar is provided, which has lots of Windows TeXmacs: WYSIWYG: Linux, macOS, Windows (2017-12-21) 1.99.6 Free GPL: Yes Yes Texmaker: Source Linux, macOS, Windows (2018-11-01) 5.0.3 Free GPL2: Yes Yes ... Autocompletion of LaTeX commands Parenthesis matching Starts up to previous state Unicode … It provides a comprehensive TeX system with binaries for most flavors of Unix... Free

Quark). with this system.

Speedata Publisher is particularly well-suited to some areas Alternatives to TeXmacs for Mac, Windows, Linux, Web, BSD and more. Also handles SQL bibliography databases, and comes with Bibi, a bibfile to SQL converter written in Haskell. I believe the main strength over tex is that it makes complete document production very automated. In fact Texmacs is the only way I know of to take advantage of alternative fonts outside of the Roman/Helvetica/monospace fonts that are at the core of Tex in a way that is even remotely as easy as a word processor.

Development never ends (as usual). It can also handle math using the preprocessing tool eqn.

While one would think that going by the name, Texmacs must have some combination of Tex and Emacs, it has dependence on neither. Texmacs documents will have a Latex look and feel, with greater flexibility in font choices, but as said earlier, all this is great as long as you are sticking largely to simple math or math in the toolbars, or as long as you avoid typesetting constructs outside of the math markup, such as tables. Is TeXmacs still being developed? Texmacs documents will have a Latex look and feel, with greater flexibility in font choices, but as said earlier, all this is great as long as you are sticking largely to simple math or math in the toolbars, or as long as you avoid typesetting constructs outside of the math markup, such as tables.